Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Hace 6 días · John Lewis Gaddis is a professor of military and naval history and the director of the Brady Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University. He is a renowned expert on the life of George Kennan and the Cold War, and has won several awards for his books on these topics.

  2. Hace 5 días · Both these approaches fail to address Mao’s paramount role in deciding China’s Cambodian policies. In We Now Know, John Lewis Gaddis writes that “the more we learn, the less sense it makes to distinguish Stalin’s foreign policies from his domestic practices or even his personal behavior.”

  3. 25 de jun. de 2024 · This book examines these strategies in the light of the lessons of the Ukraine war and identifies yardsticks with which to gauge their potential effectiveness and sustainability. Our goal, Emmott argues, must be for all sides to regard such a US–China conflict as ‘inevitably catastrophic and therefore inconceivable’. Notes.

  4. 23 de jun. de 2024 · At the time that Bundy made his exclamation to us (in the fall of 1988), the first of the two mysteries relating to Kennan was well on its way to being answered, and the man who has provided most of it is none other than the author of this official biography, John Lewis Gaddis.

  5. John Lewis Gaddis, historiador de reputação internacional, a quem o The New York Times chamou «o deão dos historiadores da Guerra Fria», é professor de História na Universidade de Yale. Pertence ao conselho consultivo do Cold War International History Project e foi consultor no documentário da CNN «Guerra Fria».

  6. Hace 5 días · John Lewis Gaddis, Robert A. Lovett professor of History, Yale University and official biographer of George F. Kennan, delivered the keynote address. George Kennan had a special talent for explaining Soviet behavior, predicting its future policies, and prescribing policy for the United States, said Angela Stent.

  7. Hace 3 días · Here, Haglund references John Lewis Gaddis, who argues, as Haglund puts it, that political scientists are “so addicted to theorizing reality as to be unable to recognize it when they see it” (73). But Haglund does not include a more revealing passage from Gaddis’s article: Historians’ interpretations, like life, evolve.