Resultado de búsqueda
19 de feb. de 2020 · Existence of scientific misconduct in the field of medical sciences has shown to inflict very severe blows to the individual and public health; highlighting the immediate need of solution finding.
- Incidence and Consequences - Fostering Integrity in Research - NCBI ...
A survey on violations of research regulations—including...
- Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: A concern - PMC
All organizations who are involved in clinical research...
- Incidence and Consequences - Fostering Integrity in Research - NCBI ...
11 de abr. de 2017 · A survey on violations of research regulations—including human subjects protection violations as well as research misconduct—was sent to all comprehensive doctoral institutions and medical schools in the United States and yielded responses from 66 percent (DuBois et al., 2013a).
20 de nov. de 2018 · According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, “Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.” 1 Other important irregularities involving the biomedical research process include, but are not limited to, ethical ...
1 de abr. de 2021 · Without a globalised approach with clear punitive measures for offenders, research misconduct and QRP not only affect reliability, reproducibility, and integrity of research, but also hinder the public trustworthiness for medical research.
16 de ene. de 2020 · For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP)—although other research misbehaviors have been also added in codes of conduct and legislations.
All organizations who are involved in clinical research should have clear operational policies and procedures for approach to research misconduct and fraud. Whistle blowers should be cultivated and there should be guidelines agreed upon internationally to safeguard them.
A survey on violations of research regulations—including human subjects protection violations as well as research misconduct—was sent to all comprehensive doctoral institutions and medical schools in the United States and yielded responses from 66 percent (DuBois et al., 2013a).
