Resultado de búsqueda
Hace 5 días · The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States is of seismic consequence. The comments below compare certain findings in the majority opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts with the views expressed by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Nos 69 and 70.
Hace 4 días · Federalist No. 69 - Good Authority. The Supreme Court’s immunity decision sidesteps history. Andrew Rudalevige - July 4, 2024. Those who framed the Constitution agreed that unchecked presidential power was a terrible idea.
Hace 23 horas · I am sure they can recite by heart Federalist Paper No. 69, written by Alexander Hamilton who distinguished the US president from the then king of Great Britain.
Hace 5 días · In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton wrote that the president would be "liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law," and that this was the distinction between the King of England, who was "sacred and invulnerable," and the president of the United States.
Hace 5 días · It is opposed in spirit to the distinction Hamilton tries to make, in Federalist No. 69, between President and king: The President of the United States would be an officer elected by the people for four years.
Hace 5 días · Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 69, drew clear distinctions between the proposed presidency and the British monarchy. Hamilton reassured skeptics that the president would be a far cry from a king, emphasizing the checks and balances embedded in the Constitution.
Hace 5 días · “The President of the United States,” Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist No. 69, “would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”
