Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 25 de may. de 2016 · Gitlab is a self-hosted git server. I have used both (plus bitbucket) and I don't see much difference in terms of functionality. Github's UI is far more advanced, and they offer some custom features (e.g. Releases). Gitlab is also available as cloud/saas product.

  2. 7 de oct. de 2016 · GitHub Flow. We have a master branch as a production branch. And we (as developers) can create branches for adding new features or fixing bugs and merge them with production (master) branch. It sounds very simple. This approach fits for extreme programming where the production branch is deployed several times in a day. GitLab Flow.

  3. Main reason is that you need to continuously support previous versions in production while developing the next version. Single version in production simple software - use Github-flow. If your code is having only one version in production at all times (i.e. web sites, web services, etc) you may use github-flow.

  4. 3. A reviewer is someone you've asked to review the changes you've proposed in a pull request. An assignee is someone who is working on a pull request. From the GitHub documentation: After you create a pull request, you can ask a specific person to review the changes you've proposed.

  5. 22 de sept. de 2009 · @SteveBennett: There is a difference how Git treats branches vs how it treat tags. Besides what VonC said, you cannot advance tag by mistake: "git checkout <tag>" would generate anonymous unnamed branch (so called 'detached HEAD') and select state of tag. Creating a new commit does it on this unnamed branch, and does not change what tag points to.

  6. 14 de ago. de 2020 · 1277. GitLab's "merge request" feature is equivalent to GitHub's "pull request" feature. Both are means of pulling changes from another branch or fork into your branch and merging the changes with your existing code. They are useful tools for code review and change management. An article from GitLab discusses the differences in naming the feature:

  7. 10 de nov. de 2012 · Git and GitHub competitors. Sometimes when it comes to differentiating between Git and GitHub, I think it's good to look at who they compete against. Git competes on a plane with tools like Mercurial, Subversion and RTC, whereas GitHub is more in the SaaS space competing against cloud vendors such as GitLab and Atlassian's BitBucket. No GitHub ...

  8. 18 de sept. de 2019 · 10. GitHub copied a lot of Gitlab`s features, including CI (similar configuration and price). Actions looks like GitLab CI/CD but there are some differences between them. GitLab CI/CD has integration with Pages, issues, packages registry, it has environments dashboard, review support, manual pipelines, multi-project pipelines, support a lot of ...

  9. I was connected to GitHub and now I wanted to switch to Azure DevOps and VS Code was asking me for authentification for any action. Solution is: Open Credential Manager -> Windows Credentials. Remove credential that starts with " git: ". Open the project in VS Code and click Synchronize changes.

  10. 9 de abr. de 2021 · But if you issue is about pushing to GitLab for one repository, and GitHub for another, you don't have to do anything: each one will use (for HTTPS URL) their respective credentials. VSCode will simply push to origin, as it does by default. For SSH URL, you can use separate keys in your ~/.ssh/config file, to differentiate the remote ...